So the name thing is mostly that I want to do it once in terms of most of the official paperwork as getting banks, bills, drivers licences and other tat all done as well as retraining work mates is going to be a bother, and I don’t want to do it and then 3 or 6 months later realise I have to do it all over again as I made a mistake.
However at the minute I think the best way to articulate it is I’m not sure which narrative to follow. If I poke my brain at the minute it often tells me its name is Tabi to the point of accidentally signing off on mails as that when I’m sleepy and occasionally wanting to use it to start conversations on the phone. However my conscious mind isn’t so keen on it, possibly in part because of the alliteration.
So now I’ve got two narratives to draw wisdom from. Either I should listen to parts of my deep mind as they’re wise and know better which name to attach too based on how they fit and so forth. Or its just an animalistic part of my brain attaching to the first thing I tried for a long time and I (my noble human consciousness) should over ride that and retrain it to another name of my choice.
Eh, I think I’ll probably need to decide by the end of the week as I really need to come out at work.
Anyway stay tuned for an interesting second post on the fun of progesterone.
As a catchup, Google+ their
first second attempt at social networking requires “real names” see section 13 however they define it as “use the name your friends, family or co-workers usually call you” which for many people is not the name on their ID or indeed they may have other reasons for wanting to partition up their activity online.
An interesting summary article on the whole idea is here: “Real Names” Policies Are an Abuse of Power which reminded me of this excellent article about names and programs: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names and got me looking into this (as initially I thought it was a few more isolated incidents, it seems to be a widespread bot rampage on Google+).
In other news the EFF makes A Case for Pseudonyms as do all these people at the My namei s me project, which has some more discussion about the kinds of people who get caught out by these policies.
There are also protests being mooted: IRL on Googles Lawn and a petition aiming to suggest that the whole policy is a PITA.
Somehow I’ve managed to avoid getting grief both on Google+ (where I don’t give them my legit-name-on-ID at all) and FB (who honestly don’t seem to apply their policy unless their in a bad mood based on things I’ve done changing the names of joke/roleplaying accounts) however it would appear that G+ are being more arsey about this than I first thought from reading articles, which worries me as eventually they’ll catch up with me I guess.
What’s everyone elses thoughts?